Cases 1 - 3 of 3
United States of America v. $289,508.74 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Suntrust Bank Account Number XXXXXX6205, held in the name of "Etegrity Proce et al
as 2:2010cv01853
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$289,508.74 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Suntrust Bank Account Number XXXXXX6205, held in the name of "Etegrity Proce, $315,817.06 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Preferred Bank Account Number XXX6516, held in the name of Anaya Trading Solution, $1,905.81 IN UNITED STATES FUNDS, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom, representing all funds contained in Preferred Bank Account Number XXX6834, held in the name of Macquairie Solutions, LL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. $41,343.57 US Currency et al
as 2:2008cv01855
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$41,343.57 US Currency, Honda Accord 2005 and Ford Explorer 2004
Claimant:
John A. and Amy Zebala, John A. and Amy Zebala, Syntrix Biochip, Inc. d/b/a Syntrix Biosystems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. First Regional Bank Account #XXXXX1859 Funds Held In The Name of R K Company Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00314
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
First Regional Bank Account #XXXXX1859 Funds Held In The Name of R K Company Inc, Wells Fargo Bank Account #XXXXXX6039 Funds In The Name of Isleta Native Wholesale Supply Company, Wells Faro Bank Account #XXXXXX9568 Funds In The Name Of Native Wholesale Supply Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
