Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Danny Cohea v. Nancy Grannis, et al

as 13-17582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY JAMES COHEA
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY GRANNIS, Chief of Inmate Appeals Branch, D. FOSTON, Chief of Inmate Appeals Branch, M. HODGES WILKINS, Facility Captain/Appeals Examiner at IAB and others
Wiseman v. Cate et al

as 1:2013cv01951
Plaintiff:
Chester Ray Wiseman
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, George J. Giurbino, David Skaggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luis Armentero v. N. Lopez, et al
as 13-16901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO
Defendant - Appellee:
N. LOPEZ, JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden and K. J. ALLEN
Schrubb v. Jager et al

as 3:2013cv04163
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray Schrubb
Defendant:
Jager, D. Rusk, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schrubb v. Jager et al

as 2:2013cv01769
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray Schrubb
Defendant:
Jager, D. Rusk, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carranza et al v. Cate et al

as 4:2013cv03337
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Carranza, P. T. Smith and E. E. Hough
Defendant:
Mathew Cate, Craig Lewis, K. Cruse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammer v. Allen et al

as 2:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Hammer
Defendant:
K. J. Allen, V. Singh and Anthony Hedgepeth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloan v. Department of Corrections et al

as 5:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Sloan
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, D. C. Battles, D. Asuncion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloan v. Department of Corrections et al

as 1:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Sloan
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, D. C. Battles, D. Asuncion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Freeze et al

as 2:2012cv02894
Plaintiff:
Andres Williams
Defendant:
- Freeze, Swetland, D Foston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.