Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Brammer v. Yates et al
as 1:2007cv01350
Plaintiff:
James W. Brammer
Defendant:
James A. Yates, R. Chapnick, N Kushner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martorana v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv01203
Petitioner:
Joseph Martorana
Respondent:
K. Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saffold v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv01120
Petitioner:
Tony Eugene Saffold
Respondent:
K. Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dennis v. Mendoza-Powers
as 4:2007cv03977
Petitioner:
Willie Dennis, Jr.
Respondent:
K. Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Mendoza-Powers et al
as 3:2007cv01259
Petitioner:
Daniel Torres
Respondent:
K Mendoza-Powers and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00926
Petitioner:
George Wesley Wells
Respondent:
K. Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roderick K. Thompson v. K. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00684
Petitioner:
Roderick K. Thompson
Respondent:
K. Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caballero v. Mendoza-Powers
as 3:2007cv01852
Petitioner:
Alfred Caballero
Respondent:
K. Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lang v. Mendoza-Powers et al
as 2:2007cv00632
Petitioner:
Russell Lang
Respondent:
K. Mendoza-Powers and Jerry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lang v. Mendoza-Powers et al
as 1:2007cv00608
Petitioner:
Russell Lang
Respondent:
K. Mendoza-Powers and Jerry Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
