Cases 1 - 10 of 1,454
Leonard et al v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College et al
as 3:2013cv00565
Defendant:
Albemarle Corporation, Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Cessna Aircraft Company and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Leonard and Royce Leonard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
DECOLLO et al v. ACANDS, INC et al
as 2:2011cv64072
Plaintiff:
FLAVIAN DECOLLO and JUDY DECOLLO
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC, A-BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY, ALAN INTERNATIONAL, INCORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING AND SUPPLY et al
as 2:2010cv69515
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL P. SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING AND SUPPLY, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANSON v. BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37796
Plaintiff:
HAROLD H HANSON
Defendant:
BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY , CLEVELAND CLIFFS IRON COMPANY , CLEVELAND CLIFFS S.S. COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
USX CORPORATION , INLAND STEEL CO. , CLEVELAND CLIFFS S.S. COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
FLEXITALLIC GASKET COMPANY, LAPP INSULATOR COMPANY , LESLIE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
KAHL et al v. AMERICAN FOREIGN S. S. CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37910
Plaintiff:
NICK KAHL , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN FOREIGN S. S. CORPORATION , AMERICAN PACIFIC, AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC , USS PITTSBURGH FLEET and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
GAF CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER IND INC, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Counter_defendant:
USX CORP
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARTEL et al v. BUCKEYE STEAMSHIP CO et al
as 2:2010cv37915
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
BUCKEYE STEAMSHIP CO, INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP COMPANY , KINSMAN LINES INC. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
RAYMOND G. SHINSKI, USX CORPORATION, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
M. H. DETRICK COMPANY , KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION , TURNER AND NEWELL and others
Counter_defendant:
US STEEL CORP
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ANDERSON v. WILSON STEAMSHIP et al
as 2:2010cv37822
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. ANDERSON
Defendant:
WILSON STEAMSHIP, USX CORPORATION , BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
ILLINOIS INSULATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , MACARTHUR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WEISS v. AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37863
Plaintiff:
BERNARD L. WEISS
Defendant:
AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY , INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP COMPANY and UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND , LESLIE COMPANY , ATOCHEM NORTH AMERICA, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BELLMORE v. AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37841
Plaintiff:
STANLEY F. BELLMORE
Defendant:
AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY , SCHNEIDER TRANSPORTATION COMPANY and USX CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
USX CORPORATION , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
USX CORPORATION
Cross_claimant:
USX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MATTSON v. BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY
as 2:2010cv37879
Plaintiff:
MARVIN W. MATTSON
Defendant:
BETHLEHEM STEEL COMPANY , FORD MOTOR COMPANY , INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
USX CORPORATION , UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION , INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
JOHNS MANVILLE FUND , A AND M INSULATION COMPANY , AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY and others
Counter_defendant:
USX CORP
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
