Cases 31 - 40 of 131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ZHANG v. RENAUD et al
as 2:2021cv05382
Plaintiff:
YING ZHANG
Defendant:
ACTING DIRECTOR TRACY RENAUD, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
AK et al v. GARLAND et al
as 5:2021cv04507
Plaintiff:
EDA AK, CEM SUMERER and OLANDO ESPINAL
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
AK et al v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv04507
Plaintiff:
EDA AK, CEM SUMERER and OLANDO ESPINAL
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKIS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
CHEN v. RENAUD et al
as 2:2021cv04506
Plaintiff:
XING CHEN
Defendant:
ACTING DIRECTOR TRACY RENAUD, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255
Sulaiman et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2021cv02322
Plaintiff:
MOHANAD A. SULAIMAN, DIMA ALI AHMAD, FARES M. SULEIMAN and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
ZHENG v. RENAUD et al
as 2:2021cv04288
Plaintiff:
CUI HONG ZHENG
Defendant:
TRACY RENAUD, TONY BRYSON, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
