Social Security Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ratcliff v. Lighty
as 14-2010
Plaintiff - Appellant: Elijah W. Ratcliff, Agent
Defendant - Appellee: Donald Lighty, State Bar of Texas, Polk County, Texas and others
Hull et al v. Sebelius We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00801
Plaintiff: Carolyn Hull , Peggy Knox , Rosann Stenger and others
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Ratcliff et al v. Lighty et al
as 1:2014cv03680
Plaintiff: Elijah W. Ratcliff
Defendant: Donald Lighty, Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, State Bar of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martinelli v. Sebelius
as 1:2013cv00868
Plaintiff: Diane Martinelli
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Berman v. Sebelius We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv04513
Plaintiff: Sonia Berman
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Anghel v. Sebeliu
as 13-302
Plaintiff - Appellant: Maria-Lucia Anghel, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee: Kathleen Sebelius, in her capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Gusky v. Sebelius We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00919
Plaintiff: Joseph H. Gusky
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anghel v. Sebelius We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv04574
Plaintiff: Maria-Lucia Anghel
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Kettenmann v. Sebelius
as 1:2010cv05037
Plaintiff: Joan M. Kettenmann
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Place for Achieving Total Health v. Sebelius
as 1:2010cv03776
Plaintiff: Place for Achieving Total Health
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?