Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Keel v. Casper Sleep Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10546
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keel
Defendant:
Casper Sleep Inc., Philip Krim, Anthony Florence and others
Keels v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv07309
Plaintiff:
York Keels
Defendant:
Forest Laboratories Holdings, Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Allergan, Inc. and others
Applicant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Ganeles v. Oaktree Capital Group, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv06231
Defendant:
Robert Denham, Marna Whittington, John Frank and others
Plaintiff:
David Ganeles
Keeling v. Lawrence
as 1:2018cv03793
Respondent:
Lawrence
Petitioner:
Michael Keeling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Akassy v. Office Of The Appellate Defender et al
as 1:2017cv05251
Plaintiff:
Hughes-Denver Akassy
Defendant:
Office Of The Appellate Defender, Richard M Greenberg, Risa Gerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray et al v. 1650 Broadway Associates Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09858
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray , Brian Esposito , Samuel Ladd and others
Defendant:
1650 Broadway Associates Inc., Ken Sturm and Ellen Sturm
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Keeling v. Mahally
as 1:2016cv08406
Petitioner:
Michael E. Keeling
Respondent:
Lawrence Mahally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keeling v. Mahally
as 1:2016cv01078
Petitioner:
Michael E. Keeling
Respondent:
Lawrence Mahally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keels v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06261
Defendant:
Accurate Background, Inc. and The GEO Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eric Keels
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Keeling v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2013cv05731
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Keeling
Defendant:
Sheila Sanchez , Clifford Stanton and The Commissioners of Elections Consituting the Board of Elections in the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
