Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00353
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04634
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
KELLEY v. HUNTER WARFIELD, INC.
as 1:2013cv01070
Defendant:
HUNTER WARFIELD, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2013mc00057
Respondent:
JAMES ANDREW LOWES, JOSEPH ALLAN KELLEY, JANA ASHLEY HAGEMAN and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 1:2008mc00004
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Petters Company Inc, PCI and others
Receiver:
Douglas A Kelley
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PETTERS et al
as 1:2008mc00194
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS, PETTERS COMPANY INC., PCI and others
Receiver:
DOUGLAS A. KELLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
THE SIERRA CLUB et al VS GATES ET AL
as 2:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
THE SIERRA CLUB, THE SIERRA CLUB, THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS WORKING GROUP and others
Defendant:
ROBERT M GATES, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, PETE GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Kelley v. National Check Bureau Inc
as 2:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
Shawn V Kelley
Defendant:
National Check Bureau Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
