Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Windrock, Inc. v. Resonance Systems et al (TV2)
as 3:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
Windrock, Inc.
Defendant:
Resonance Systems and Joshua Kelley
Williams et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012mc00072
Petitioner:
Anthony Troy Williams and Robyn Kelley
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, Karl Dean and others
Kelley et al v. National Fitness Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Richard Kelley and Laura Kelley
Defendant:
National Fitness Center, Inc., Dimitra K Clark, Optima Recovery Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Winslow v. Bancorpsouth, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00463
Plaintiff:
Edward B. Winslow
Defendant:
Bancorpsouth, Inc., Aubrey B. Patterson, Jr., James V. Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Butler, et al v. Shelby County, et al
as 2:2003cv02650
Plaintiff:
Lynell Marcus Butler , Kevin Andersen , Myron Arps and others
Defendant:
Shelby County Government , Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and Annie's Pest Control Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelley v. CCA at SCCC et al
as 1:2009mc00011
Plaintiff:
Ezra M. Kelley
Defendant:
CCA at SCCC, TN Dept. of Corrections and George Little
Kelley et al v. Brushy Mountain Correctional Complex et al
as 3:2009mc00094
Plaintiff:
Cortney Kelley and Michael Dates
Defendant:
Brushy Mountain Correctional Complex and Dean Hall
Long et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
as 3:2009cv00114
Plaintiff:
Vicky Long, Vicky Long, Vicky Long and others
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority, Geosyntec Consultants, Inc, Parsons Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Petters et al
as 2:2008mc00021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Joseph Petters, Deanna Coleman, Robert White and others
Receiver:
Douglas A. Kelley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
