Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Moquin v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00433
Plaintiff:
Kelly C Moquin
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lorenzen v. Toshiba America Information Systems Inc.
as 1:2020cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kellie Lorenzen
Defendant:
Toshiba America Information Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Licul v. Hurlman et al
as 1:2019cv00244
Defendant:
The Council on PostSecondary Education, Bridget Hurlman and Mary Holt-Kelsch
Plaintiff:
Kelly Licul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Baby Products, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Newport Fish Traps, Inc. v. Kelly
as 1:2018cv00489
Defendant:
Michael A Kelly
Plaintiff:
Newport Fish Traps, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Sobel v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
Nancy Sobel
Defendant:
Asa S. Davis, III and Lauren B Kelly-Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haviland et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03442
Plaintiff:
Patrick Haviland and Kellie Haviland
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moxley et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03421
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Moxley and Kelly Moxley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEACH et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv03173
Plaintiff:
KELLY BEACH and MARION BEACH
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Groves v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2009cv00514
Plaintiff:
Linda Groves, Linda Groves, Linda Groves and others
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton Company, Allied Signal, Inc., Allis Chalmers Pumps Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
