Cases 1 - 10 of 238
Thompson v. Wasko et al
as 1:2024cv03670
Plaintiff:
Arron Marko Thompson
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. Criaye et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Sqeo et al
as 1:2024cv03421
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Roundtree
Defendant:
Sqeo, Stewart, Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Hughes et al
as 1:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Giles
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Chance Jones, Cherryle Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams II v. Cavazos et al
as 3:2024cv50128
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Williams II
Defendant:
Kimberly Cavazos, Dana L. McCormick, Sue R. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Kelly et al
as 1:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant:
Mike Kelly, Well Path, S Hunckler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Shroader et al
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Terrence Williams
Defendant:
Nlcholas Shroader, Matthew Gallacier, Adam Linder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Kelly et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ray E. Hale
Defendant:
Mike Kelly and Will County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Kelly et al
as 1:2023cv16923
Plaintiff:
Ray E Hale
Defendant:
Mike Kelly and Will County Adult Dention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Will County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv16881
Plaintiff:
James E. Gomez
Defendant:
Will County Adult Detention Center, Mike Kelly, Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
