Cases 1 - 10 of 1,245
(PC) Kelly v. Bandaru et al
as 2:2024cv01161
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
Bandaru, Akintola, Gina Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jalaal Abdullah v. Kelly Santoro et al
as 2:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Ibn Abdullah
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, John or Jane Doe, K. Mixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duley v. Rizk et al
as 1:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Kelly Duley
Defendant:
Rizk and Medical Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duley v. Venegas et al
as 1:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Kelly Duley
Defendant:
Venegas, Sandoval and Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kelly v. Hiaing
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
James Carl Kelly
Defendant:
M. Hiaing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Hixon
as 3:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Lamar Kelly
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Hixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Dilnessa v. O'Brien, et al
as 2:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Ayalneh Dilnessa
Defendant:
Kelly S. O'Brien, Butte County Public Guardian, Butte County Department of Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasmen Lavar Hall v. Patricia Ann Charlton et al
as 2:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Jasmen Lavar Hall
Defendant:
Patricia Ann Charlton, Richard Kirschner, Kelly E. Greco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Clarke v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv03004
Petitioner:
Lee Kelly Clarke
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Johnson v. Masuda et al
as 2:2023cv02883
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Johnson and Keith D. Johnson
Defendant:
Kelly Masuda, Mahle C Emmett, Donell A. Slivka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
