Cases 1 - 10 of 49
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Respondent:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, STATE OF GEORGIA and KELLI ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Kelly et al
as 1:2023cv00177
Petitioner:
Walker Washington, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kelly, Captain Chase, Lt. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plummer v. Sampson
as 2:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Kelly Plummer
Respondent:
Warden Gregory Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whittle v. Andrews et al
as 3:2022cv00131
Petitioner:
Thomas Andrew Whittle
Respondent:
Lt. Col. Major S. B. Andrews, Brian Robinson, The Dodge County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelly v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv02294
Petitioner:
Kevin Lamonte Kelly
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Superior Court of Douglas County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. United States Of America
as 2:2020cv00072
Respondent:
United States Of America and Linda Geter
Petitioner:
Kelly Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Denson v. Lee
as 1:2019cv03451
Respondent:
Stephen Mutt and Kelly Lee
Petitioner:
Mario Denson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Musa v. Kelly et al
as 1:2017cv04546
Petitioner:
Ibrahim Ahmed Musa
Respondent:
John Kelly, Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Sean Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mirabal v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017cv00142
Petitioner:
Alexander Mirabal
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions, Oreste Cruz, Juan Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taoufik v. Kelly et al
as 1:2017cv03790
Petitioner:
Zakaria Taoufik
Respondent:
John F. Kelly and Denise Frazier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
