Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 16-2445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.
Defendant:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, MDOC Director, SHERRY BURT, UNKNOWN JACKSON, MCF Deputy Warden and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN MOREFIELD, MCF Prison Guard, UNKNOWN MCDONALD, MCF Prison Guard, MCF RESIDENT UNIT MANAGER JEANINE WINGER and others
Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Karl Foy, et al
as 14-1456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KARL FOY, ICF Classification Director; ICF Transfer Coordinator and MYKEN D. BREEDLOVE, ICF Grievance Coordinator
Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Prison Health Services, Inc., et al
as 14-1332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL L. BROSTOSKI, THERESA M. MERLING and others
Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Gary Capello, et al
as 13-1927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY J. CAPELLO, Warden, Warden, LINDA TRIBLEY, Deputy Warden, TIMOTHY HILL, Prison Guard and others
Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 12-1273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden, MDOC Director - In her official and personal capacities, DAVE BURNETT, MDOC Special Activities Coordinator - in his official and personal capacities, WAYNE DESHAMBO, LMF Food Service Director - In his official and personal capacities and others
Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Michael Martin
as 11-2084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTIN
Kenneth Colvin, Jr. v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 08-2441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH COLVIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, MDOC Director - In her official and personal capacities, DAVE BURNETT, MDOC Special Activities Coordinator - in his official and personal capacities, WAYNE DESHAMBO, LMF Food Service Director - In his official and personal capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
