Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Citizens for a Better Way, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 17-15533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITIZENS FOR A BETTER WAY, STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA!, GRASS VALLEY NEIGHBORS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, KEVIN K. WASHBURN, Esquire, Assistant Secretary of the Interior - Indian Affairs, MICHAEL S. BLACK, Director, United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 17-15245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CACHIL DEHE BAND OF WINTUN INDIANS OF THE COLUSA INDIAN COMMUNITY, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, KEVIN K. WASHBURN, Esquire, Assistant Secretary of the Interior - Indian Affairs, MICHAEL S. BLACK, Director, United States Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
The Cloud Foundation, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 13-16076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG DOWNER, LORNA MOFFAT and THE CLOUD FOUNDATION
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, ROBERT ABBEY, Director, BLM, GARY MEDLEN, BLM Field Manager, Egan Field Office and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE and SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
Lincoln Peratrovich, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-36070
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINCOLN PERATROVICH, SHAKAN KWAAN, Tlingit Band of Rural Alaska residents and TAANTA KWAAN, Tlingit Band of Rural Alaskan residents
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TOM VILSAK, Secretary of Agriculture, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
STATE OF ALASKA
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar
as 12-5346
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell
Appellant:
Clayton P. Crowe
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior
Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo I, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-16539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLOVERDALE RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA, a Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, JAVIER MARTINEZ, SARAH GOODWIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, DONALD "DEL" LAVERDURE, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, MICHAEL S. BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Jared Bedke, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-35341
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JARED K. BEDKE, BRUCE BYRON BEDKE and MARTHA JEAN BEDKE
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CASSIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, RANDY KIDD, in his official capacity as Cassia County Sheriff, CARY BRISTOL, in his official capacity as Cassia County Undersheriff and others
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5271
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Colombe
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5272
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mary Aurelia Johns
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-5270
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Thomas Maulson, James Louis Larose and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carol Eve Good Bear
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Larry Echohawk, Assistant Secretary of the Interior-Indian Affairs, Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
