Cases 11 - 20 of 27
ROBERTS v. NELSON et al
as 2:2014cv08095
Petitioner:
ALBERT ROBERTS
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. NELSON et al
as 1:2014cv07788
Petitioner:
MELVIN SHAWN JONES
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. STOUT et al
as 3:2014cv07699
Plaintiff:
LARRY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CARL STOUT, ANTHONY ANDERSON, II, LISA JANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. STOUT et al
as 3:2014cv07388
Plaintiff:
LARRY O. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CARL STOUT, ANTHONY ANDERSON, II, LISA JANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUGH v. NELSON et al
as 2:2014cv06209
Petitioner:
STANFORD YOUGH
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DYKEMAN v. NELSON
as 2:2014cv06111
Petitioner:
WILLIAM DYKEMAN
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LOVE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv05629
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , NORTHERN STATE PRISON , GARY LANIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. NELSON et al
as 2:2014cv04968
Petitioner:
EARL W. TAYLOR
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEWIS v. NELSON
as 1:2014cv02547
Petitioner:
ROLAND D. LEWIS
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMALL v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2013cv07642
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMALL
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, GARY LANIGAN, CHARLES WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
