Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Hafils Akpovi v. David Douglas, et al
as 21-2852
Petitioner / Appellant:
Hafils Y. Akpovi
Defendant / Appellee:
David Douglas, District Director USCIS Nebraska District Office, William Connor, Field Office Director U.S.Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Citzenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Sandra Hernandez de Gutierrez, et al v. William P. Barr, et al
as 20-3683
Defendant / Appellant:
Kevin McAleenan, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Leslie Tritten, Director, St. Paul Field Office, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Heberth Gutierrez and Sandra Hernandez de Gutierrez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
