Cases 51 - 60 of 170
THOMAS v. TUCKER et al
as 3:2012cv00586
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY VINCENT THOMAS, SR
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, JOHN WHITEHURST, LINDA MARININ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. TUCKER et al
as 5:2012cv00387
Plaintiff:
DERREL LEONARD THOMAS, JR
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, LOUIS CORDOVA, AIGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casey v. Tucker
as 2:2012cv00651
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Casey
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guardacosta v. Tucker
as 0:2012cv62413
Plaintiff:
David A. Guardacosta
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICHARDS v. TUCKER et al
as 4:2012cv00615
Plaintiff:
AMON DEAN RICHARDS
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, G WELLHAUSEN, GREG RISKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Mount et al
as 8:2012cv02698
Plaintiff:
Gary Steven Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Mount, Glenn R. Morris, J. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard v. State of Florida et al
as 0:2012cv62351
Plaintiff:
Marv A. Hubbard
Defendant:
State of Florida and Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Tucker et al
as 3:2012cv01256
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lewis
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker, Florida Department of Health-Bureau Correctional Medical Authority, Amador Nazareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Tucker et al
as 8:2012cv02617
Plaintiff:
Amon Dean Richards
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker and C. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. Tucker et al
as 3:2012cv01244
Plaintiff:
Amon Dean Richards
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker and C. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
