Cases 1 - 10 of 902
BUDD v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TRACY ALLEN BUDD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CAROSELLI v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
JACK CAROSELLI
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WRAY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
SHARON M. WRAY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HERSBERGER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02270
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN D. HERSBERGER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HATCHER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02276
Plaintiff:
JASON HATCHER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
HOCKENBERRY v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
OSCAR P. HOCKENBERRY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FOSTER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02265
Plaintiff:
KENYA M. FOSTER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CALDWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
KAREN CALDWELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
RICHARDSON v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
CODY A. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MCMILLEN v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
AARON MCMILLEN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
