Cases 1 - 10 of 30
United States of America v. Cherry et al
as 1:2019cv00173
Defendant:
Tony Cherry, Kimberly D. Cherry and The Medical Center at Scottsville
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Parrigin et al
as 3:2019cv00404
Defendant:
Kimberly R. Parrigin and Unknown Spouse of Kimberly R. Parrigin
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Harrison et al
as 5:2018cv00485
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Harrison, Unknown Spouse of Chuck W. Harrison and Chuck W. Harrison
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Kingston et al
as 5:2018cv00462
Defendant:
Matthew G. Kingston and Kimberly D. Kingston
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Southwick et al
as 5:2018cv00097
Defendant:
David M. Southwick, Kimberly Ann Southwick and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Stephens et al
as 6:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Kimberly Stephens, Unknown Spouse of Kimberly Stephens and Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Belcher et al
as 1:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kimberly Belcher, U.S. Bank National Association, N.D. and Kentucky Housing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Newman et al
as 5:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Kimberly Newman, Unknown Spouse of Kimberly Newman and Commonwealth of Kentucky, Division of Collections, Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Hoover et al
as 6:2016cv00196
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Kimberly J. Hoover and Teddy Ray Woodall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Corey et al
as 0:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Paul Russell Corey, Kimberly Dawn Corey, Kentucky, Commonwealth of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
