Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Thompson v. King et al
as 1:2021cv03061
Plaintiff:
Sanza Eugene Thompson
Defendant:
Sherri King and Michael Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Fourth Judicial Complex et al
as 1:2021cv02352
Plaintiff:
Sanza Eugene Thompson
Defendant:
Fourth Judicial Complex, El Paso County Combined Courts, Findorff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Denver Sheriff's Dept
as 1:2021cv00121
Defendant:
Denver Sheriff's Dept
Plaintiff:
Bailey King
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER/ INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Bailey King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobos v. Dainels et al
as 1:2020cv03456
Plaintiff:
Adrian Alfredo Cobos
Defendant:
Destiny Padilla, Aarron Trujillo, Felicia Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobos v. Jefferson County Detention Jail et al
as 1:2020cv03337
Defendant:
Breeanna Espinoza, Mario Trujillo, Jefferson County Detention Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian A Cobos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. King et al
as 1:2019cv03640
Defendant:
Kings Tree Service and James King
Plaintiff:
Leslie K. Mathis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Pierre v. King et al
as 1:2019cv03629
Defendant:
D. Wolf and Janet King
Plaintiff:
Randall St. Pierre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Colorado Attorney Generals Office et al
as 1:2019cv02516
Defendant:
North Task Colorado, FBI Denver Colorado, DEA Washington DC and others
Plaintiff:
Rob Allen Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. Com Cor Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02171
Defendant:
El Paso County Jail, Criminal Justice Center, Janet King, Donna and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Lavonne Lee Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abram v. ComCor Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01802
Defendant:
ComCor Inc, Trinity Food Services, Peter Lichtman and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Abram and Howard Lavonne Lee Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
