Cases 41 - 50 of 68
PICKENS v. WRENN et al
as 3:2013cv06262
Plaintiff:
IVAN MOSI PICKENS
Defendant:
WILLIAM WRENN, JOHN DOE #1, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. CHRISTIE et al
as 1:2013cv03433
Plaintiff:
SHARROD KING
Defendant:
C. CHRISTIE, GARY LANIGAN, C. RAY HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2013cv00477
Petitioner:
LESLIE R. KING
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, GARY M. LANIGAN and JEFFREY CHIESA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2013cv00055
Petitioner:
LESLIE R. KING
Respondent:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JEFFREY CHEISA and STATE OF NEW JEREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
INGRAM v. ADKINS et al
as 1:2012cv05132
Plaintiff:
NATHAN JAMIL INGRAM
Defendant:
ALBERT RITCHER, CHRIS FOSSLER, ANTHONY PIZZARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. BARTOWSKI
as 1:2011cv04358
Petitioner:
WARREN KING
Respondent:
GREG BARTOWSKI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. BONDISKEY et al
as 1:2011cv03836
Plaintiff:
AARON R. JOHNSON
Defendant:
LOUIS KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2011cv01793
Defendant:
KAREN BALICKI, C/O R. YACOVELLI, C/O R. HOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT H. ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAGG v. LIBRARIAN MUNIAK et al
as 1:2010cv06187
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG
Defendant:
LIBRARIAN MUNIAK, ADMINISTRATOR KAREN BALICKI, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. RICCI et al
as 2:2010cv03753
Petitioner:
LESLIE KING
Respondent:
MICHELLE R. RICCI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
