Cases 1 - 10 of 86
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finnell v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kyle Finnell
Defendant:
Govern Mike DeWine, Lt. Jon Husted, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King III v. Souders et al.
as 1:2023cv02089
Plaintiff:
Roy King III
Defendant:
Amanda Souders, Greg Frankart, Jason Flick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Lance Jermaine Harris
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as Jody L. King and U.S. Attorney General doing business as Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
King v. Bobby
as 5:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Deny L. King
Respondent:
Dave Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv00156
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Lance King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hayes et al
as 2:2022cv04023
Plaintiff:
James Williams, IV and James Williams, IV, r
Defendant:
David Hayes, Suzzane Schmidt, Michelle Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. King et al
as 2:2022cv03815
Plaintiff:
James Williams, IV and James Williams, IV, r
Defendant:
Adrian King, Greene Co. Public Def. and John-Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. King et al
as 2:2022cv03816
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Attorney Adrian King and John-Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. McGraw
as 1:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
Karl L. King
Defendant:
Attorney Brian R. McGraw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
