Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dohrman et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Duane Dohrman, Donald McCain, Joanne McMahon and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Midcap et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06971
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Midcap, David Daniel, David Thorson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Shortt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Mark Shortt, Rob Hibbitt, Gordon Cooper and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Alford et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv00025
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Officer Gregory Alford, Curtis Anderson, Ronald Atwater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission LLC v. 8.49 Acres et al
as 6:2017cv00468
Plaintiff:
Dominion Carolina Gas Transmission LLC
Defendant:
8.49 Acres, Steven W Oliver, 0.89 Acres and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Capital Investment Funding LLC et al v. LOP Capital LLC et al
as 6:2011cv03321
Plaintiff:
Capital Investment Funding LLC and Cosimo LLC
Defendant:
LOP Capital LLC, Strategic Lending Solutions LLC, Michael Loprieno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight v. Primal Vantage Company Inc et al
as 0:2007cv04099
Plaintiff:
Robert L Knight
Defendant:
Primal Vantage Company Inc, Primal Vantage Company Inc, Dick's Sporting Goods Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
