Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stanley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Stanley
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, David W. Ogden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pierre v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2007cv01998
Petitioner:
Johnny Joseph Pierre
Respondent:
United States Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Karen F. Hogsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roscoe v. Dobson et al
as 1:2007cv01509
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo A. Roscoe
Defendant:
Dobson, Troy Williamson, Karen F. Hogsten and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jennings v. Hogsten et al
as 3:2007cv01488
Petitioner:
Arel Jennings
Respondent:
Karen F. Hogsten, United States Parole Commission and Gregory E. Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pinkney v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2007cv01451
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Pinkney
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Industry Corporation Unicor, James Oheroy-Brady, Dr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Monroe v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2007cv01327
Plaintiff:
Joseph Monroe
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzalez
Defendant:
Karen F. Hogsten, K. Pugo, K. Laino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Burnside v. Hogsten
as 4:2007cv00934
Petitioner:
John Otis Burnside
Respondent:
Karen F. Hogsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coates v. Hogsten
as 1:2007cv00424
Petitioner:
Leroy W. Coates
Respondent:
Karen F. Hogsten, Karen F. Hogsten and Thomas Marino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Trivino v. Hogsten
as 3:2007cv00123
Petitioner:
Jose G. Trivino
Respondent:
Karen F. Hogsten and Karen F. Hogsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
