Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Hutton v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, ROBERT WILLESDEN and (FNU) BAGBY
Shriner v. Rohlings, et al
as 08-3048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL K. SHRINER
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Luton v. Rohling et al
as 5:2008cv03054
Petitioner:
John D Luton
Respondent:
Karen Rohling and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutton v. Rohling et al
as 5:2008cv03049
Plaintiff:
Larece T Hutton
Defendant:
Karen Rohling, Ro Boese, (fnu) McFessell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutton v. Rohling et al
as 5:2008cv03034
Plaintiff:
Terrell Hutton
Defendant:
Karen Rohling, Robert Willesden and (fnu) Bagby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Rohling
as 5:2008cv03027
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutton v. Rohlings, et al
as 08-3006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARECE TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, ROBERT WILLESDEN, Disciplinary Administrator, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and D. E. WALLACE
Hutton v. Rohlings, et al
as 08-3007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARECE TERRELL HUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLINGS, Warden, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and ROBERT WILLESDEN, Disciplinary Administrator, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Pierce v. Rohling et al
as 5:2007cv01405
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Karen Rohling and Phil Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutton v. Rohling et al
as 5:2007cv03307
Plaintiff:
Larece Terrell Hutton
Defendant:
Karen Rohling and Robert Willesden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
