Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Hutton v. Rohlings et al
as 5:2007cv03285
Plaintiff:
Larece Terrell Hutton
Defendant:
Karen Rohlings and Robert Willesden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray et al v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03276
Plaintiff:
Ronald Murray, Jeff Hunt and Emmett Kirkham
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Gloria Geither and Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Rohling
as 5:2007cv03253
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2007cv03244
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Smith
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Charles E. Simmons, Bill Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnell v. Clinton et al
as 5:2007cv03241
Plaintiff:
Rolly O Kinnell
Defendant:
Bill Clinton, George Bush, FNU LNU (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bafford v. Pokorski et al
as 5:2007cv03230
Plaintiff:
Johnathan William Bafford
Defendant:
(fnu) Pokorski, Karen Rohling and Roger Werholtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Werholtz et al
as 5:2007cv03182
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bruce White
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, (fnu) Knight, L E Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Rohling
as 5:2007cv03083
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling
as 5:2007cv03078
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. Rohling
as 6:2007cv00044
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Karen Rohling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
