Cases 21 - 30 of 126
John Armstrong, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-16018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN ARMSTRONG, JAMES AMAURIC, RICHARD PONCIANO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., MICHAEL MINOR, MATTHEW CATE and others
Leonel Guzman v. Dickinson et al
as 1:2012cv00713
Plaintiff:
Leonel Guzman
Defendant:
Kathleen Dickinson, James D. Hartley, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Bray v. Dickinson et al
as 1:2012cv00710
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bray
Defendant:
Kathleen Dickinson, James D. Hartley, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mario Gonzales v. Dickinson et al
as 1:2012cv00709
Plaintiff:
Mario Gonzales
Defendant:
Kathleen Dickinson, James D. Hartley, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ornelas v. Dickinson et al
as 1:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ornelas
Defendant:
Kathleen Dickinson, James D. Hartley, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Alvarez v. Dickinson et al
as 1:2012cv00712
Plaintiff:
Vincent Alvarez
Defendant:
Kathleen Dickinson, James D. Hartley, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvatore Maggio v. Kathleen Dickinson
as 12-15538
Petitioner - Appellant:
SALVATORE CARMELO MAGGIO
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DICKINSON
George Johnson v. Kathleen Dickinson
as 12-15518
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEORGE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DICKINSON
David Curtis v. Kathleen Dickinson, et al
as 12-55374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SCOTT CURTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden of California Medical Facility, official capacity, ROBERT DOYLE, Chairperson, Board of Parole Hearings, official capacity, SANDRA BRYSON, Commissioner, Board of Parole Hearings, official capacity and others
David Fuschak v. Kathleen Dickinson
as 12-15262
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL FUSCHAK
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHLEEN DICKINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
