Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Wheaton College v. Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs. et al
as 1:2013cv08910
Plaintiff:
Wheaton College
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs., United States Department of Health and Human Services, Thomas E Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Center for Dermatology and Skin Cancer LTD et al v. Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs. et al
as 1:2013cv04926
Plaintiff:
Center for Dermatology and Skin Cancer LTD , Robert V. Kolbusz , Diane M Rzewuski and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs., Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation and CAHABA SAFEGUARD ADMINSTRATORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Lindsay, et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2013cv01210
Plaintiff:
Lindsay, Rappaport and Postel, LLC and William C Lindsay
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services , Kathleen Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs. , United States Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Rush University Medical Center v. Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs.
as 1:2012cv04672
Plaintiff:
Rush University Medical Center
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Bryn Mawr Care, Inc. v. Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs. et al
as 1:2011cv00734
Plaintiff:
Bryn Mawr Care, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs. and Damon T. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Columbus Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center v. Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs.
as 1:2010cv04317
Plaintiff:
Columbus Park Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
