Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Patterson v. Mendoza-Powers
as 2:2007cv00929
Petitioner:
Jeff Patterson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00686
Petitioner:
Jeff Patterson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruben Sanchez v. Kathy Mendoza Powers
as 2:2007cv02628
Petitioner:
Ruben Sanchez
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giovinco v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00585
Petitioner:
Frank Lorenzo Giovinco
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manuel Lucero v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers
as 5:2007cv00376
Petitioner:
Manuel Lucero
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Amos v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00440
Petitioner:
Donald J. Amos
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Powers
as 3:2007cv01580
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wade Patterson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Powers
as 3:2007cv01579
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Wade Patterson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Mendoza-Powers
as 2:2007at00256
Petitioner:
Edward B. Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Mendoza-Powers, et al
as 2:2007cv00531
Petitioner:
Edward B. Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
