Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Stasik v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01467
Plaintiff: Ross Stasik
Defendant: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, Ltd., NYK Line (North America), Inc., Eukor Car Carriers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Spicer et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line) et al
as 4:2013cv02894
Plaintiff: Sean Spicer , Phyllis Rosen , Gustavo Adolfo Perez and others
Defendant: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line), NYK Line (North America) Inc., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Levis et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al
as 3:2013cv02895
Plaintiff: Ashton Levis and Bruce Hertz
Defendant: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, NYK Line (North America) Inc., Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02696
Plaintiff: Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Hudson Charleston Acquisition, LLC , John O'Neil Johnson Toyota, LLC and others
Defendant: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, NYK Line (North America) Inc., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Schroeder v. Kaisha et al
as 3:2013cv01319
Defendant: CSAV Agency North America, LLC, American Logistics Network, LLP, Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Alex White and David Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
MacQuarrie et al v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv02409
Plaintiff: Joan MacQuarrie and Brenda Keegan
Defendant: Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, NYK Line (North America), Inc., Wilh. Wilhelmsen Holding ASA and others
Movant: Marten Cars of Washington, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Yang Ming (UK) Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv08699
Respondent: Can Loch Enterprises Ltd., Fortune International Enviro-Resources Ltd., Foshan Nanhai Zhongbian Metals Ltd. and others
Petitioner: Yang Ming (UK) Ltd. and Yang Ming Marine Transportation Corp.
In Re: Yang Ming (UK) Ltd. and Yang Ming Marine Transportation Corp.
Starbucks Corporation v. Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd et al Featured Case
as 2:2009cv01230
Plaintiff: Starbucks Corporation
Defendant: Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd, Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd and others
Cross Claimant: Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd
Cross Defendant: Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd
ThirdParty Plaintiff: Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. and Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
ThirdParty Defendant: Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iran We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008mc80030
Plaintiff: Deborah D. Peterson
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran
Garnishee: Clearstream Banking, S.A.
Petitioner: World Bank
3Rd Party Defendant: Japan Bank for International Cooperation, Non-Party CMA CGM, Non-Party A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and others
Interested Party: The Export-Import Bank of Korea, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, ABN AMRO Bank N.V. and others
Amicus Curiae: California Bankers Association, the Institute of International Bankers, the International Bankers Association in California and others
Not Classified By Court: International Finance Corporation
Continental Insurance Company v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv06148
Plaintiff: Continental Insurance Company
Defendant: Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd., "K" Line America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?