Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Keith CalvinIn re: Keith Calvin
as 24-10067
Petitioner:
In re: KEITH L. CALVIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Calvin v. Secretary et al
as 5:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Keith L. Calvin
Respondent:
Florida Department of Corrections Secretary and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Calvin v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 21-11285
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH L. CALVIN
Keith Calvin v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 19-14269
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH L. CALVIN
Calvin v. Jones et al
as 3:2019cv00916
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Calvin
Defendant:
Julie L. Jones, Woodrow Myers and Corizon Health Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Calvin v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-14933
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH L. CALVIN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Keith Calvin
as 15-15478
Petitioner:
In re: KEITH L. CALVIN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
In re: Keith Calvin
as 15-13991
Petitioner:
In re: KEITH L. CALVIN
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Calvin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2015cv00030
Petitioner:
Keith L. Calvin
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keith Calvin v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 12-16543
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH L. CALVIN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
