Cases 21 - 30 of 187
In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 2:2022md03025
In Re:
In Re: Proctor & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation and In Re: Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Plaintiff:
Erik Velasques, Frank Ortega, Matthew Lopez and others
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Kelley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
Judith Kelley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelley v. Cambridge Metropolitan Housing Authority
as 2:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Carla Kelley
Defendant:
Cambridge Metropolitan Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kelley et al v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 1:2021cv00785
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA KELLEY, JEREMY WILSON, DANTE MELENDEZ and others
Defendant:
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graham v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05222
Plaintiff:
Kelley Graham
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv04095
Plaintiff:
Melinda R. Kelley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kelley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03082
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Johnny Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heitzman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02891
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kelley Heitzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02051
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frankie Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01844
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Janet Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
