Cases 41 - 50 of 287
ROH v. SHULTZ et al
as 1:2021cv02560
Plaintiff:
BM3 JOSHUA DILLON ROH and JOSHUA DILLON ROH
Defendant:
Admiral KARL L. SHULTZ, Rear Admiral JOANNA NUNAN, Rear Admiral WILLIAM G KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MARTINO et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv01808
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTINO, SYBIL MARTINO, DOROTHY ACKLIN and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
JALLOH v. HUGEE et al
as 1:2021cv01480
Defendant:
SEAN HODGES, CURTIS SLOAN, UNNAMED JOHN DOE OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
ALPHA JALLOH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2021cv01577
Not Classified By Court:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mitchell
SMITH v. PEREZ et al
as 1:2021cv00986
Plaintiff:
KELLY SMITH
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and JERMAINE PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KRAMER v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv01088
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
KELLY MONIQUE KRAMER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
LAWYERS UNITED INC. et al v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2019cv03222
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., AMIT P MEHTA, JON S TIGAR and others
Not Classified By Court:
JEFFREY S WHITE, RU D MOSS and EVELY AIMEE DE JESUS
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS UNITED INC, LAWYERS UNITED INC. and EVELYN AIMEE DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01209
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
