Cases 11 - 20 of 152
Alexander v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Alexander, III and Robert E. Samuel
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilation, North Kern State Prison Offender Case Records Office Appeals Coordinator, Strategic Offender Management System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Santoro
as 5:2022cv09148
Petitioner:
Kenneth Hawkins
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McFadden v. Santoro
as 2:2022cv02244
Petitioner:
Akeim Rashad McFadden
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandon Christopher Ritter v. Kelly Santoro
as 5:2022cv02176
Petitioner:
Brandon Christopher Ritter
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McFadden v. Santoro
as 4:2022cv07504
Petitioner:
Akeim Rashad McFadden
Respondent:
Warden Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlos Marez v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2022cv08581
Petitioner:
Carlos Marez
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Kirby Allen v. Kelly Santoro
as 22-55869
Petitioner / Appellant:
KIRBY DEARLLE ALLEN
Respondent / Appellee:
KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden
Elliot Kimo Laanui v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2022cv04365
Petitioner:
Elliot Kimo Laanui
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akil Robbins v. Kelly Santoro
as 2:2022cv04234
Petitioner:
Akil Robbins
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC)Hickman v. Santoro
as 1:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
William Vertel Hickman
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
