Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant: VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor: TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner: In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Adams County, PA, et alIn re: Adams County, PA, et al
as 22-3653
Not Classified By Court: In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Petitioner: ADAMS COUNTY, PA, LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP, PA, ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA and others
David Sper v. Kent County, MI, et al
as 21-2989
Plaintiff / Appellee: DAVID SPER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jonathan Sper
Defendant / Appellant: KENT COUNTY, MI, a Municipal Corporation, LAWRENCE A. STELMA, In his individual capacity, MICHELLE LAJOYE-YOUNG, In her individual capacity and others
Trent Young v. Kent County Sheriff's Dept, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1222
Plaintiff / Appellee: TRENT YOUNG
Defendant / Appellant: WILLIAM JOURDEN and BRYAN CLARK
Defendant: KENT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Ricardo Rosario v. Health Care (MDOC), et al
as 20-1646
Defendant: HEALTH CARE (MDOC)
Defendant / Appellee: KENT COUNTY, MI, UNKNOWN PARTY #3, Health Care Provider, KENT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICARDO CORA ROSARIO
Brian Schwab v. Kent County, MI, et al
as 20-1531
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN KEITH SCHWAB
Defendant / Appellee: UNKNOWN PARTY #1, ROB STEELE, Special Activities, UNKNOWN DEVRIES and others
Bartlett v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00157
Plaintiff: Angel Bartlett
Defendant: Drug Enforcement Agency, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Unknown Part(y)(ies) #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1109
Abdullah v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00411
Plaintiff: Saabir Abdullah
Defendant: United States of America, Michigan, State of and Kent County Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?