Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
In re: Kentuckians for the Commonwea, et al
as 15-5771
Petitioner: In re: KENTUCKIANS FOR THE COMMONWEALTH and SIERRA CLUB
Appalachian Voices, Inc. et al v. Frasure Creek Mining, LLC et al
as 7:2015cv00023
Plaintiff: Appalachian Voices, Inc. , Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. , Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. and others
Defendant: Frasure Creek Mining, LLC and Trinity Coal Corporation
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Kentuckians for the Commonwealth et al v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2015cv00004
Plaintiff: Kentuckians for the Commonwealth and Sierra Club
Defendant: Gina McCarthy and Heather McTeer Toney
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Kentucky Waterways Alliance et al v. McCarthy et al
as 3:2013cv01207
Plaintiff: Kentucky Waterways Alliance , Sierra Club , Appalachian Voices and others
Defendant: Gina McCarthy and A. Stanley Meiburg
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Kentuckians for the Comwlth, et al v. USACE, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-6153
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENTUCKIANS FOR THE COMMONWEALTH and SIERRA CLUB
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, THOMAS P. BOSTICK and LUKE T. LEONARD
Kentuckians for the Commonwealth et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00682
Plaintiff: Kentuckians for the Commonwealth and Sierra Club
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers and Thomas P. Bostick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
National Mining Association, et al v. Lisa Jackson, et al
as 12-5311
Plaintiff - Appellee: National Mining Association, Randy Huffman, Plaintiff in case 11-cv-295 RBW, In his official capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, and acting on behalf of the, State of West Virginia, Plaintiff in case 11-cv-295 RBW and others
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee: Commonwealth of Kentucky, In case no.:11-cv-446 RBW and City of Pikeville, Kentucky, In Case No.: 11-cv-446 RBW
Defendant - Appellee: Lisa Perez Jackson, sued in her official capacity, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, John M. McHugh, sued in his official capacity, Secretary of the Army and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellant: Sierra Club, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Coal River Mountain Watch and others
National Mining Association, et al v. Lisa Jackson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-5310
Plaintiff - Appellee: National Mining Association, Randy Huffman, Plaintiff in case 11-cv-295 RBW, In his official capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, and acting on behalf of the, State of West Virginia, Plaintiff in case 11-cv-295 RBW and others
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee: Commonwealth of Kentucky, In case no.:11-cv-446 RBW and City of Pikeville, Kentucky, In Case No.: 11-cv-446 RBW
Defendant - Appellant: Lisa Perez Jackson, sued in her official capacity, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency, John M. McHugh, sued in his official capacity, Secretary of the Army and others
Defendant - Appellee: Hazard Coal Corporation, In Case No.: 11-cv-447 RBW
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Sierra Club, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Coal River Mountain Watch and others
APPALACHIAN VOICES et al v. JACKSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00523
Plaintiff: APPALACHIAN VOICES , CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK , ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT and others
Defendant: LISA P. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Sierra Club et al v. Laurel Mountain Resources, LLC
as 7:2011cv00184
Plaintiff: Sierra Club and Kentuckians for the Commonwealth
Defendant: Laurel Mountain Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?