Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Kijakakzi
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jacobs v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Jacobs
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Massalone v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Massalone
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Brian Kevin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schandel v. Commissioner for Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Schandel
Defendant:
Commissioner for Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00730
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dion Johnson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ahern v. Astrue
as 5:2011cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Ahern
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
U.S. Attorney Tim Heaphy, Michael B. Mukasey and SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv00009
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Johnson
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
King v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Kevin King
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Kyttle v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 7:2010cv00138
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kyttle
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
