Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gipson v. Warden Najara
as 2:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Gipson
Defendant:
Warden Najara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01936
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dwyer v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2014cv00367
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Dwyer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Holmes v. Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 2:2013cv00877
Defendant:
R. Anderson, D. Fielding, D. Franc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Holmes, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Page et al v. Grandview Marketing Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01150
Plaintiff:
Eddie Page, Eddie Page, Eddie Page and others
Defendant:
Grandview Marketing, Inc., Grandview Marketing, Inc., Kevin M. Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Levandoski et al v. Grandview Marketing, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01152
Plaintiff:
Thomas Levandoski, Michael Moretti and Joyce Vance
Defendant:
Grandview Marketing, Inc., Grandview Marketing, Inc., Kevin M. Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wellington v. Benedetti et al
as 3:2008cv00601
Petitioner:
Kevin M. Wellington
Respondent:
James Benedetti and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Whorton et al
as 3:2008cv00145
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Harris
Defendant:
Glenn Whorton, Howard Skolnick, Dorothy Nash-Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00431
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
