Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Indeed, Inc. v. Khan et al
as 1:2021cv00356
Defendant:
Too Apree, LLC and Asif Khan
Plaintiff:
Indeed, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Ascentium Capital LLC v. Pasqualini Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00845
Defendant:
Khans LLC, Pasqualini Construction, Inc., NRWA LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ascentium Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ballariano et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00790
Plaintiff:
Dino Ballariano, Juan Bautista, Jo-Anne Beverage and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft and Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Cocchia v. Briones et al
as 4:2016cv03779
Defendant:
Jorge Briones, M. Rashid Khan, World Wide Realty, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carroll Cocchia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ali v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv03066
Plaintiff:
Meryem Ali
Defendant:
Adeel Shah Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khan v. Carroll
as 4:2012cv00841
Plaintiff:
Muhammad A Khan
Defendant:
Frank Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Khan v. Carroll's Discount Office Furniture et al
as 4:2011cv04622
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Akram Khan
Defendant:
Carroll's Discount Office Furniture , Accounting Department and Bookkeeper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sharif, et al v. Wellness Intl Ntwrk, et al
as 08-10866
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SHARIF, As Agent for Soad Wattar, Haifa Kaj, and Ragda Sharifeh, WAQAR KHAN, SHAFQUT KHAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLNESS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK LTD, also known as WIN, RALPH OATS, CATHY OATS and others
Sharif, et al v. Wellness Intl Ntwrk, et al
as 07-10834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SHARIF, As Agent for Soad Wattar, Haifa Kaj and Ragda Sharifeh, WAQAR KHAN, SHAFQUT KHAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WELLNESS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK LTD, also known as WIN, RALPH OATS, CATHY OATS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
