Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KHAN v. NAVIENT CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
HARIS N KHAN
Defendant:
NAVIENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KHAN, M.D. v. Stephen et al
as 9:2023cv80702
Plaintiff:
DR SAEED AKHTAR KHAN and SAEED AKHTAR KHAN, M.D.
Defendant:
Noel E. Stephen, JAVIER A. GONZALEZ, TERESA CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson-Washington v. GILLESPIE et al
as 0:2022cv60958
Plaintiff:
Andramedia Cheryl Robinson-Washington
Defendant:
KENNETH L. GILLESPIE, SHARI AFRICK OLEFSON, KlM THERESA MOLLICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
KHAN v. NAVIENT CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
HARIS N KHAN
Defendant:
NAVIENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
KHAN et al v. NAVIENT CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
HARIS N KHAN and SAVID ALI
Defendant:
NAVIENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Caplan v. Lou's Super Service Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60187
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
LOU'S SUPER SERVICE INC. and KHAN APT 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Speech First, Inc. v. Cartwright
as 6:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Harold Mills, Angela Williams, Beverly Seay and others
Plaintiff:
Speech First, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01524
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
