Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Scott Halley v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1934
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scott M. Halley
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Stacy Reel v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stacy L. Reel
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Hutson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv03048
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bradley K Hutson and Bradley K. Hutson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lisa Austin v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1617
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Austin
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Brian Dahle v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1601
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Brian T. Dahle
Defendant / Appellant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Stephen Klick v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1497
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen Klick
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Nellie Baldridge v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nellie A. Baldridge
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Troy Harper v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1202
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Harper
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Martha Wise v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Martha Ann Wise
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Tabitha Cain v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tabitha Regina Cain
Defendant / Appellee:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
