Cases 21 - 30 of 277
King v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene King
Defendant:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Eric King
Respondent:
Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Esquibel v. Goman, et al.
as 1:2022cv03109
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Esquibel
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Kieth Goman, Alexis King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Oklahoma DOC et al
as 4:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Noel King, Sonny Moore, Reginald Anderson and others
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma DOC, Derrick Yazel, Jason Lemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Bridges
as 5:2022cv00906
Petitioner:
Rodney King
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges, Director DOC Scott Crow and John O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Bridges
as 6:2022cv00288
Petitioner:
Rodney King
Respondent:
Scott Crow, John O'Connell and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collinge v. King
as 5:2022cv03095
Petitioner:
Adam B. Collinge
Respondent:
Scott King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee (ID 77035) v. Butler & Associates, P.A. et al
as 5:2022cv03090
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Lavell Lee
Defendant:
Butler & Associates, P.A., David M. Braun, Zachary A. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. King Soopers et al
as 1:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Garren Thomas Wright
Defendant:
King Soopers, Evergreen Berg in Park, Brian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Kunzweiler et al
as 4:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Dwayne King and Dewayne King
Defendant:
Steve Kunzweiler, Savannah Titus, Chad Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
