Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ariegwe v. Godfrey et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Montana and Dimitri Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ariegwe v. Bludworth et al
as 4:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Pete Bludworth and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ariegwe v. Bludworth et al
as 4:2022cv00034
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Pete Bludworth and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ariegwe v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2016cv00023
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ariegwe v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2015cv00096
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ariegwe v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2014cv00060
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ariegwe v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2013cv00091
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ariegwe v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2012cv00101
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ariegwe v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2012cv00037
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ariegwe v. Mahoney et al
as 6:2011cv00043
Petitioner:
Kingsley Ariegwe
Respondent:
Mike Mahoney and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.