Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MARTINEZ et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2016cv02193
Plaintiff:
SAUL MARTINEZ , SARAH MARTINEZ , ERIN DRUCTOR and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
GRIFFIN v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2016cv01876
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GRIFFIN
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BARD DENALI CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KLINE v. MORGAN-ALCALA
as 1:2013mc01255
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KLINE
Defendant:
VICTORIA MORGAN-ALCALA
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, et al v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 1:2011cv01629
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS , COALITION FOR A DEMOCRATIC WORKPLACE , NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD , MARK PEARCE , CRAIG BECKER and others
Amicu:
JOHN KLINE , UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES , DAN BURTON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
THUMA v. KLINE et al
as 1:2011cv00844
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH M. THUMA
Defendant:
VALERIE KLINE and MARY KELLAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01802
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HENDRICKS et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02286
Plaintiff:
GLORIA HENDRICKS, KATY HOBBS, CAROLYN HOLMES and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
