Voting Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
GADSDEN COUNTY REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE et al v. GADSDEN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 4:2023cv00537
Plaintiff: Gasdsen County Republican Executive Committee, William B Durham and GADSDEN COUNTY REPUBLICAN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Defendant: GADSDEN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, Gasdsen County School Board, in her capacity as G Shirley Green Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liebert, Susan et al v. Wisconsin Elections Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff: Susan Liebert, Anna Haas, Anna Poi and others
Defendant: Wisconsin Elections Commission, Don M. Millis, Robert F. Spindell and others
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee and Republican Party Of Wisconsin
Amicus Curiae: Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. BYRD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00215
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, EQUAL GROUND EDUCATION FUND, VOTERS OF TOMORROW ACTION, INC. and others
Defendant: CORD BYRD, ASHLEY MOODY, KIM BARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Addoh-Kondi et al v. Jefferson County Commission,The et al
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff: Alexia Addoh-Kondi, Cynthia Bonner, Ja'Nelle Brown and others
Defendant: Jefferson County Commission,The, Steve Ammons, T. Joe Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
McClure et al v. Jefferson County Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00443
Plaintiff: Cara McClure, Birmingham Ministries, Metro-Birmingham Branch of the NAACP, The and others
Defendant: Jefferson County Commission, James A. Stephens, T. Joe Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff: VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant: CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021mc81824
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant: The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81824
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant: The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81823
Plaintiff: FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA and COMMON CAUSE
Defendant: Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee and NATIONAL REPUBLICATION SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER et al v. LEE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00201
Defendant: LAUREL M LEE, CRAIG LATIMER, PENNY OGG and others
Plaintiff: UNIDOSUS, Poder Latinx, HISPANIC FEDERATION and others
Intervenor Defendant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae: District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?