Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Markell et al
as 1:2015cv01184
Plaintiff:
Shamsidin Ali
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Robert Coupe, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00325
Plaintiff:
Idris Young, Ernest Parson, Michael Manley and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardwick v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Hardwick
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Knights of Columbus et al
as 1:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Gerald I. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Knights of Columbus, Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In Re: Photochromic Lens Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014mc00189
Defendant:
Transitions Optical Inc., Essilor International SA, Essilor of America, Inc. and others
Movant:
Holland & Knight
Plaintiff:
Keith Forbes and Brian Keith Roller
Intervenor:
Vision Service Plan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Trusted Knight Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01063
Plaintiff:
Trusted Knight Corporation
Defendant:
International Business Machines Corporation and Trusteer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Turner v. Coupe et al
as 1:2014cv00950
Plaintiff:
Orin Turner
Defendant:
Coupe, Pierce, Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendez v. Calderon, et al.
as 1:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
Felipe Calderon, Mexican Congressmen, Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
