Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Knott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv02149
Plaintiff:
Michelle Sharee Knott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Knott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02864
Plaintiff:
Matthew Knott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knotts-Simmons v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
Kurt Knotts-Simmons
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. $26,300.00 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2021cv01043
Interested Party:
Peter Knott
Defendant:
$26,300.00 in U.S. Currency seized on September 12, 2020, by Homeland Security Investigations and $26,300.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Knott et al v. Elleman et al
as 1:2020cv00961
Plaintiff:
Tina Knott and Joseph L. Knott
Defendant:
David G. Elleman, Grange Mutual Ins. Co. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Knott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04637
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gayle Knott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knotts v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01664
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deirdre Knotts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2018cv01226
Plaintiff:
Dawn Marie Knott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Knott v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45370
Plaintiff:
The County of Knott
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P. , Purdue Pharma Inc. , Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
