Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Colton Crane Company, LLC v. Terex Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv08525
Attorney Settlement Officer:
Attorney Settlement Officer
Plaintiff:
Colton Crane Company, LLC
Defendant:
DOES, Koehring Cranes, Inc., Terex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. T.C. Johnson Company et al
as 1:2007cv06288
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. and National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Defendant:
T.C. Johnson Company, Transportation Resources, Inc., Mitchell Equipment Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
CRAWFORD et al v. AMCA/KOEHRING CO. et al
as 2:2007cv60020
Plaintiff:
VAN CRAWFORD and JOYCE CRAWFORD
Defendant:
AMCA/KOEHRING CO., AMCA/KOEHRING CO., AMDURA CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Cevasco et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2004cv05760
Plaintiff:
Louis Cevasco and Diane Cevasco
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. , Mitchell Equipment Corporation , T.C. Johnson Company and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corp
Thirdparty_defendant:
Crescent Contracting, Inc. , Mitchell Equipment Corporation , Transportation Resources Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Mitchell Equipment Corporation , Transportation Resources Inc. , Crescent Contracting, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp., Mitchell Equipment Corporation, T.C. Johnson Company and others
Counter_defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp , Mitchell Equipment Corporation, T.C. Johnson Company and others
Cross_claimant:
Mitchell Equipment Corporation , Crescent Contracting, Inc. , Transportation Resources Inc. and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Jugal K. Sood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
