Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Salveson v. Related Management Company, L.P. et al
as 1:2021cv10929
Plaintiff:
Kent Salveson
Defendant:
RELATED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, L.P., 17th AND 10th ASSOCIATES LLC, 10th ASSOCIATES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tano Holdings Inc. v. CPS 1 Realty LP et al
as 1:2011cv00468
Plaintiff:
Tano Holdings Inc.
Defendant:
CPS 1 Realty LP and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
Counter_claimant:
CPS 1 Realty LP
Counter_defendant:
Tano Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ludkin v. 75 Wall Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv05556
Plaintiff:
Maria Ludkin
Defendant:
75 Wall Associates, LLC, Behrouz Ben Hakimian, Joe Hakamian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TEVK, LLC et al v. 75 Wall Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv10214
Plaintiff:
TEVK, LLC and AK46, LLC
Defendant:
75 Wall Associates, LLC and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Shepell et al v. 1240 First Avenue LLC et al
as 1:2009cv09038
Plaintiff:
Warren Shepell and Morris Berchard
Defendant:
1240 First Avenue LLC, Izak Senbahar, Simon Elias and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Bloch v. 1240 First Avenue LLC et al
as 1:2009cv05075
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Bloch, Linda S. Bloch and Linda S. Bloch
Defendant:
1240 First Avenue LLC, Izak Senbahar, Simon Elias and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
BENGIS V MOSS
as 09-1049
Plaintiff-Appellant:
John Joseph Bengis
Defendant-Appellee:
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP and Richard Moss, Esq.
Bengis v. Moss et al
as 1:2008cv04237
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Bengis
Defendant:
Richard Moss and Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
